Diabetes can be viewed as a form of 'possession'
If one observes carefully the dilemma of a
diabetic, the sufferers are more than just sufferers, in the sense that
diabetic sufferers are virtually unafraid of the consequences of
diabetes which include, but not limited to, blindness, kidney failure
and amputation of limbs for those afflicted with necrotic wounds at
peripheral regions of their bodies.
Doesn't diabetics see the dire straits of what diabetes can lead to?
How is it that a 'wasting away' of the body does not seem to 'educate'
them to stay away from an 'exorbitant' gustatory love for sweetness.
Isn't it wrong to link diabetes to a form of 'addiction' (which is
milder than calling it a 'possession'). A relentless search in the
information superhighway, books, journals, etc drew a blank many times
over about diabetes being seen as an 'addictive' disease. Is there any
piece of research paper which can allude diabetes to being an
The term 'addiction' does
not seem to apply to diabetes because there has never
been any known research into the 'intoxicating' and 'addictive' effects
of glucose, fructose, sucrose and whatever. To say sugars are
'intoxicating' does not seem to make sense. Note that sugars are the
precursors of alcohol, but we are talking about sugars here not its
However, note very carefully here that ethanol is actually a by-product
of anaerobic fermentation of blood-sugars and most types of fungi cells
use anaerobic fermentation to derive bio-chemical energy. We are not
sure whether ethanol has anything to do with the 'addiction' but the
bio-chemical researchers should pursue this and provide objective data.
fungi is likely the cause.
It is by far one of the
most profound paradox
that has troubled researchers --
the emotion of diabetics for sweet stuff. Are diabetic sufferers
actually 'possessed' by some phenomena which 'made' them somehow
develop gradually a morbid love for sugar until they die. If so, What
is that something? The source should come from inside the human body,
and incidentally that is what 'possession' is all about. Is diabetes a
possession of the mind, because the mind interprets gustatory (tongue,
taste) sense pleasures. It seems complicated. What is actually going on
inside the human body and mind to result in a human to possess a
morbid-love of sugar?
Such a train of thought regarding a possibility that diabetes concerns
a 'possession'-like malady is not unfounded because a great majority of
diabetics is facing a strong emotion here; an emotion so strong that to
miss the connection of the diabetic emotion as being of an 'addictive'
nature is virtually a deliberate gullibility.
There are sources of repute talking about yeast, Candidiasis, and its
bad effects on sufferers and some of these sources do touch on the fact
that the emotional love for sugars in a diabetic is in parallel to the
physiological 'love' for sugars by fungus metabolising sugars which is
about 5% efficient in deriving bio-chemical energy (ATP) when compared
to human cells. Is this parallelism just plain coincidence without any
correlation altogether. We do not think so.
It came to be that several cases of diabetic conditions which we had
encountered showed greatly reduced desire for sugars thus responding
positively to an alkalization diet (as used successfully for
candidiasis or yeast infections) SOLIDLY indicates a peculiar
characterizations of diabetes. We are seeing a certain correlation
between fungus propensity for fermenting sugars round the clock and the
diabetic propensity for a sweet diet.
There is ndeed a basis for the development of an abnormal gustatory
love for sweet stuff and the basis is coming from inside the
individual: There is
high possibility the root cause is a class of pathogenic fungi. Due to
current lack of confirmation on this, we are developing a beneficent
suspicion. The beauty is that this beneficent suspicion naturally
requires alkalization as a solution, and it works. The sample size may
be small currently but if the scientific researchers take this
seriously as an experiment, a beneficent suspicion could be turned into
a conjecture and later a theory.